Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFNAX vs RWMFX
AFNAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFNAX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth A
Price$24.33
Change+$0.10 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.88
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
AFNAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFNAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. AFNAX (1.72B). AFNAX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: AFNAX (1.52) vs RWMFX (1.38). AFNAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFNAX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). AFNAX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFNAX (21.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFNAX: RWMFX (250) vs AFNAX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. AFNAX (-1.82). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.34 vs. AFNAX (29.07).
| AFNAX | RWMFX | AFNAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.31 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.31 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.512 | 8.297 | -6% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.38 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | 6.45 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.12 | 33.08 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.07 | 42.34 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.68 | 82.48 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement