Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFNAX vs RWEBX
AFNAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts AFNAX vs RWEBX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth A
Price$26.46
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.72
Change+$0.30 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
AFNAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFNAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNAX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. AFNAX (1.86B). AFNAX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: AFNAX (1.60) vs RWEBX (0.78). AFNAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: AFNAX (13 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than AFNAX (0.85). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFNAX (12.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFNAX: RWEBX (250) vs AFNAX (2500). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.99 vs. AFNAX (5.16). AFNAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.32 vs. RWEBX (47.71).
| AFNAX | RWEBX | AFNAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.06 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.06 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.897 | 7.897 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 205B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.78 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.16 | 8.99 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.51 | 28.15 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.32 | 47.71 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.96 | 78.94 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement