AFMJF
Price
$0.71
Change
-$0.02 (-2.74%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
896.34M
TLOFF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
318.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFMJF vs TLOFF

Header iconAFMJF vs TLOFF Comparison
Open Charts AFMJF vs TLOFFBanner chart's image
Alphamin Resources
Price$0.71
Change-$0.02 (-2.74%)
Volume$399.26K
Capitalization896.34M
Talon Metals
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$517.32K
Capitalization318.86M
AFMJF vs TLOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFMJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFMJF vs. TLOFF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMJF is a Hold and TLOFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AFMJF: $0.71 vs. TLOFF: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: AFMJF and TLOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFMJF: 187% vs. TLOFF: 46%
Market capitalization -- AFMJF: $896.34M vs. TLOFF: $318.86M
AFMJF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $896.34M. TLOFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $318.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFMJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTLOFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFMJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TLOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFMJF is a better buy in the long-term than TLOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFMJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLOFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFMJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TLOFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AFMJF and TLOFF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AFMJF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.50% price change this week, while TLOFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFMJF($896M) has a higher market cap than TLOFF($319M). TLOFF YTD gains are higher at: 352.614 vs. AFMJF (-5.235). AFMJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 286M vs. TLOFF (-3.49M). AFMJF has more cash in the bank: 57.7M vs. TLOFF (41.2M). TLOFF has less debt than AFMJF: TLOFF (176K) vs AFMJF (59.5M). AFMJF has higher revenues than TLOFF: AFMJF (579M) vs TLOFF (0).
AFMJFTLOFFAFMJF / TLOFF
Capitalization896M319M281%
EBITDA286M-3.49M-8,187%
Gain YTD-5.235352.614-1%
P/E Ratio7.75N/A-
Revenue579M0-
Total Cash57.7M41.2M140%
Total Debt59.5M176K33,807%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFMJF vs TLOFF: Fundamental Ratings
AFMJF
TLOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5793
SMR RATING
1..100
2992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4734
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFMJF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLOFF (37). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLOFF (93). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLOFF (92). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TLOFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as AFMJF (47). This means that TLOFF’s stock grew similarly to AFMJF’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as TLOFF (100). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew similarly to TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFMJFTLOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFMJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCECX14.190.15
+1.07%
Martin Currie Emerging Markets C
APPLX16.800.08
+0.48%
Appleseed Investor
ERSMX31.970.08
+0.25%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R
ABSZX21.270.05
+0.24%
AB Discovery Value Z
HNDRX82.72-0.01
-0.01%
Horizon Defined Risk Investor

AFMJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AFMJF and LYSDY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AFMJF and LYSDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFMJF
1D Price
Change %
AFMJF100%
-3.29%
LYSDY - AFMJF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
LYSCF - AFMJF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
SMMYY - AFMJF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
BDNNY - AFMJF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
IVPAF - AFMJF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
More

TLOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLOFF and NBYCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLOFF and NBYCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLOFF
1D Price
Change %
TLOFF100%
+0.04%
NBYCF - TLOFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.66%
PNPNF - TLOFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
NGXXF - TLOFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.49%
AFMJF - TLOFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
GIGGF - TLOFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
More