AFMJF
Price
$0.67
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
860.74M
TLOFF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
336.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFMJF vs TLOFF

Header iconAFMJF vs TLOFF Comparison
Open Charts AFMJF vs TLOFFBanner chart's image
Alphamin Resources
Price$0.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$157.79K
Capitalization860.74M
Talon Metals
Price$0.30
Change+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Volume$1.45M
Capitalization336.23M
AFMJF vs TLOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFMJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFMJF vs. TLOFF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMJF is a StrongBuy and TLOFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AFMJF: $0.67 vs. TLOFF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: AFMJF and TLOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFMJF: 66% vs. TLOFF: 136%
Market capitalization -- AFMJF: $860.74M vs. TLOFF: $336.23M
AFMJF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $860.74M. TLOFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $336.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFMJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTLOFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFMJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TLOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFMJF is a better buy in the long-term than TLOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFMJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLOFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFMJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TLOFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TLOFF is a better buy in the short-term than AFMJF.

Price Growth

AFMJF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.33% price change this week, while TLOFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFMJF($861M) has a higher market cap than TLOFF($336M). TLOFF YTD gains are higher at: 387.745 vs. AFMJF (-9.544). AFMJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 286M vs. TLOFF (-3.49M). AFMJF has more cash in the bank: 57.7M vs. TLOFF (41.2M). TLOFF has less debt than AFMJF: TLOFF (176K) vs AFMJF (59.5M). AFMJF has higher revenues than TLOFF: AFMJF (579M) vs TLOFF (0).
AFMJFTLOFFAFMJF / TLOFF
Capitalization861M336M256%
EBITDA286M-3.49M-8,187%
Gain YTD-9.544387.745-2%
P/E Ratio7.40N/A-
Revenue579M0-
Total Cash57.7M41.2M140%
Total Debt59.5M176K33,807%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFMJF vs TLOFF: Fundamental Ratings
AFMJF
TLOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6085
SMR RATING
1..100
2992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4635
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFMJF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLOFF (36). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as TLOFF (85). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew similarly to TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLOFF (92). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TLOFF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as AFMJF (46). This means that TLOFF’s stock grew similarly to AFMJF’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as TLOFF (100). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew similarly to TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFMJFTLOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFMJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNDCX15.960.16
+1.01%
MFS New Discovery C
NBPIX50.990.42
+0.83%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Instl
WBCCX10.840.05
+0.42%
TETON Westwood Balanced C
WBALX16.990.07
+0.41%
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Inv Cl
THGIX26.65-0.10
-0.37%
Thornburg International Growth R6

AFMJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AFMJF and LYSDY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AFMJF and LYSDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFMJF
1D Price
Change %
AFMJF100%
+0.58%
LYSDY - AFMJF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
LYSCF - AFMJF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
SMMYY - AFMJF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
BDNNY - AFMJF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
IVPAF - AFMJF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
More

TLOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLOFF and NBYCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLOFF and NBYCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLOFF
1D Price
Change %
TLOFF100%
+2.93%
NBYCF - TLOFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+14.91%
PNPNF - TLOFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
NGXXF - TLOFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
AFMJF - TLOFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
GIGGF - TLOFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.12%
More