AFMJF
Price
$0.87
Change
-$0.01 (-1.14%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BHP
Price
$60.87
Change
-$0.21 (-0.34%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
155.24B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFMJF vs BHP

Header iconAFMJF vs BHP Comparison
Open Charts AFMJF vs BHPBanner chart's image
Alphamin Resources
Price$0.87
Change-$0.01 (-1.14%)
Volume$30.45K
Capitalization1.11B
BHP Group
Price$60.87
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
Volume$854.99K
Capitalization155.24B
AFMJF vs BHP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFMJF vs. BHP commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMJF is a StrongBuy and BHP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AFMJF: $0.87 vs. BHP: $60.87)
Brand notoriety: AFMJF: Not notable vs. BHP: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFMJF: 10% vs. BHP: 29%
Market capitalization -- AFMJF: $1.11B vs. BHP: $155.24B
AFMJF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.11B. BHP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $155.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFMJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBHP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFMJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the long-term than AFMJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFMJF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BHP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFMJF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BHP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFMJF is a better buy in the short-term than BHP.

Price Growth

AFMJF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.80% price change this week, while BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +8.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+8.44% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($155B) has a higher market cap than AFMJF($1.11B). BHP has higher P/E ratio than AFMJF: BHP (17.16) vs AFMJF (9.37). BHP YTD gains are higher at: 29.973 vs. AFMJF (16.636). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.8B vs. AFMJF (290M). BHP has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. AFMJF (16M). AFMJF has less debt than BHP: AFMJF (42.6M) vs BHP (24.5B). BHP has higher revenues than AFMJF: BHP (51.3B) vs AFMJF (574M).
AFMJFBHPAFMJF / BHP
Capitalization1.11B155B1%
EBITDA290M25.8B1%
Gain YTD16.63629.97356%
P/E Ratio9.3717.1655%
Revenue574M51.3B1%
Total Cash16M12B0%
Total Debt42.6M24.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFMJF vs BHP: Fundamental Ratings
AFMJF
BHP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1320
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5242
SMR RATING
1..100
2899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8239
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFMJF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (7) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that AFMJF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as AFMJF (52) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to AFMJF’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHP (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that AFMJF’s stock grew significantly faster than BHP’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (42) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that AFMJF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFMJF (82) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFMJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFMJFBHP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFMJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BHP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTUM255.471.15
+0.45%
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
MODL48.060.20
+0.41%
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF
SHDG32.840.10
+0.31%
Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF
UCIB28.04N/A
N/A
UBS ETRACS BgCstMtCdy(CMCI)TtlRetETNSerB
DIVN26.83-0.22
-0.81%
Horizon Dividend Income ETF

AFMJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFMJF has been loosely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFMJF jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFMJF
1D Price
Change %
AFMJF100%
-0.89%
LYSDY - AFMJF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
LYSCF - AFMJF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
RIO - AFMJF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
BHP - AFMJF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
BDNNY - AFMJF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
More