Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFMCX vs NAESX
AFMCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts AFMCX vs NAESX
Acuitas US Microcap Institutional
Price$15.56
Change+$0.06 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.77M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$126.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.34B
AFMCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFMCX vs. NAESX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMCX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. AFMCX (106M). NAESX pays higher dividends than AFMCX: NAESX (1.21) vs AFMCX (0.02). AFMCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: AFMCX (11 years) vs NAESX (65 years). AFMCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). AFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFMCX: NAESX (3000) vs AFMCX (10000). AFMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.30 vs. NAESX (8.22). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 36.35 vs. AFMCX (23.22).
| AFMCX | NAESX | AFMCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.17 | 882% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.17 | 1,088% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.826 | 9.833 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 3000 | 333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.21 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | 8.22 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.58 | 44.83 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.22 | 36.35 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.50 | 143.16 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement