Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFMCX vs NAESX
AFMCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts AFMCX vs NAESX
Acuitas US Microcap Institutional
Price$14.99
Change-$0.37 (-2.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.89M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.91
Change-$2.72 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
AFMCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFMCX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMCX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. AFMCX (101M). NAESX pays higher dividends than AFMCX: NAESX (1.22) vs AFMCX (0.02). AFMCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: AFMCX (11 years) vs NAESX (65 years). AFMCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). AFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFMCX: NAESX (3000) vs AFMCX (10000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. AFMCX (0.81). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. AFMCX (42.65).
| AFMCX | NAESX | AFMCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.17 | 882% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.17 | 1,153% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.402 | 6.726 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 3000 | 333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.22 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.81 | 1.42 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.06 | 33.14 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.65 | 48.22 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.51 | 137.58 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement