Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFMCX vs FSSNX
AFMCX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts AFMCX vs FSSNX
Acuitas US Microcap Institutional
Price$14.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.5M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
AFMCX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFMCX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMCX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. AFMCX (94.5M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than AFMCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs AFMCX (0.02). AFMCX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: AFMCX (11 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). AFMCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). AFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFMCX: FSSNX (0) vs AFMCX (10000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. AFMCX (-2.21). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. AFMCX (57.43).
| AFMCX | FSSNX | AFMCX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.03 | 6,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.03 | 7,840% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 2.204 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.5M | 25.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.92 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.21 | 3.28 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.17 | 31.42 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.43 | 60.96 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.71 | 82.15 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers