Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFMCX vs FSSNX
AFMCX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts AFMCX vs FSSNX
Acuitas US Microcap Institutional
Price$16.38
Change+$0.18 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.52M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.34
Change+$0.28 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.6B
AFMCX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFMCX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMCX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.6B vs. AFMCX (107M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than AFMCX: FSSNX (1.08) vs AFMCX (0.00). AFMCX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: AFMCX (12 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). AFMCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). AFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFMCX: FSSNX (0) vs AFMCX (10000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.91 vs. AFMCX (14.63). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 30.76 vs. AFMCX (19.76).
| AFMCX | FSSNX | AFMCX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.03 | 6,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.03 | 7,400% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.622 | 6.887 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 107M | 28.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.63 | 18.91 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.12 | 47.31 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.76 | 30.76 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.47 | 165.50 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement