Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFMCX vs FSSNX
AFMCX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts AFMCX vs FSSNX
Acuitas US Microcap Institutional
Price$15.56
Change+$0.06 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.77M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.74
Change+$0.09 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
AFMCX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFMCX vs. FSSNX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMCX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. AFMCX (106M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than AFMCX: FSSNX (0.80) vs AFMCX (0.02). AFMCX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: AFMCX (11 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). AFMCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). AFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFMCX: FSSNX (0) vs AFMCX (10000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. AFMCX (10.30). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 31.66 vs. AFMCX (23.22).
| AFMCX | FSSNX | AFMCX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.03 | 6,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.03 | 7,400% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.826 | 14.668 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106M | 29.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.80 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | 13.24 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.58 | 50.13 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.22 | 31.66 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.50 | 120.25 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement