Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFLG vs RECS
AFLG vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts AFLG vs RECS
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
Price$36.67
Change+$0.29 (+0.80%)
Volume$48.49K
Net Assets327.95M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$37.37
Change+$0.28 (+0.75%)
Volume$347.58K
Net Assets3.1B
AFLG vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFLG vs. RECS commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFLG is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.1B vs. AFLG (328M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than AFLG: RECS (7.943) vs AFLG (6.611). AFLG was incepted earlier than RECS: AFLG (6 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than AFLG (0.55). RECS (49.00) and AFLG (48.00) have matching turnover.
| AFLG | RECS | AFLG / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.611 | 7.943 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 328M | 3.1B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.15 | 367% |
| Turnover | 48.00 | 49.00 | 98% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AFLG | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 71% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AFLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFLG has been closely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFLG jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFLG | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| AXP - AFLG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| TROW - AFLG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| BLK - AFLG | 80% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| IVZ - AFLG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| PFG - AFLG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||