AFL
Price
$109.85
Change
-$0.77 (-0.70%)
Updated
Dec 26, 02:01 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.98B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UNM
Price
$79.05
Change
-$0.34 (-0.43%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.23B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFL vs UNM

Header iconAFL vs UNM Comparison
Open Charts AFL vs UNMBanner chart's image
Aflac
Price$109.85
Change-$0.77 (-0.70%)
Volume$431
Capitalization57.98B
Unum Group
Price$79.05
Change-$0.34 (-0.43%)
Volume$382.14K
Capitalization13.23B
AFL vs UNM Comparison Chart in %
AFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFL vs. UNM commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a Buy and UNM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AFL: $110.62 vs. UNM: $79.05)
Brand notoriety: AFL and UNM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 37% vs. UNM: 26%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $57.98B vs. UNM: $13.23B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $57.98B. UNM’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $13.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $168.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $29.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNM is a better buy in the long-term than AFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UNM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AFL and UNM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +0.11% price change this week, while UNM (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

UNM is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.03% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFL($58B) has a higher market cap than UNM($13.2B). UNM has higher P/E ratio than AFL: UNM (15.29) vs AFL (14.54). UNM YTD gains are higher at: 10.727 vs. AFL (8.723). AFL has more cash in the bank: 76.4B vs. UNM (36.1B). UNM has less debt than AFL: UNM (3.75B) vs AFL (8.69B). AFL has higher revenues than UNM: AFL (18B) vs UNM (13B).
AFLUNMAFL / UNM
Capitalization58B13.2B439%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.72310.72781%
P/E Ratio14.5415.2995%
Revenue18B13B138%
Total Cash76.4B36.1B212%
Total Debt8.69B3.75B232%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs UNM: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
UNM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7011
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
9395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
569
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
39n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNM's Valuation (44) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (70). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (5). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's SMR Rating (93) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (95). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (52). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFL (56). This means that UNM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLUNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQP180.961.05
+0.58%
Tradr 2X Long Innovation100 QuarterlyETF
NBXG14.470.05
+0.35%
Neuberger Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc.
DXUV60.660.19
+0.31%
Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF
DAX45.670.09
+0.20%
Global X DAX Germany ETF
IBIF25.96-0.03
-0.12%
iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term Tips ETF

AFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been closely correlated with GL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then GL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFL
1D Price
Change %
AFL100%
-0.09%
GL - AFL
66%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
MET - AFL
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
PRU - AFL
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
PRI - AFL
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
UNM - AFL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More

UNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNM has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNM jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNM
1D Price
Change %
UNM100%
-0.43%
CNO - UNM
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
PRI - UNM
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
MET - UNM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
GL - UNM
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
AFL - UNM
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
More