AFL
Price
$104.57
Change
+$1.05 (+1.01%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
49.4B
30 days until earnings call
NWWCF
Price
$4.95
Change
+$1.25 (+33.78%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFL vs NWWCF

Header iconAFL vs NWWCF Comparison
Open Charts AFL vs NWWCFBanner chart's image
Aflac
Price$104.57
Change+$1.05 (+1.01%)
Volume$994.9K
Capitalization49.4B
New China Life Ins
Price$4.95
Change+$1.25 (+33.78%)
Volume$100
Capitalization16.3B
AFL vs NWWCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWWCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFL vs. NWWCF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a Buy and NWWCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AFL: $104.57 vs. NWWCF: $4.95)
Brand notoriety: AFL and NWWCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 46% vs. NWWCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $49.4B vs. NWWCF: $16.3B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $49.4B. NWWCF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $16.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNWWCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NWWCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the long-term than NWWCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWWCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NWWCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the short-term than NWWCF.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +0.64% price change this week, while NWWCF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.76% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFL($49.4B) has a higher market cap than NWWCF($16.3B). AFL has higher P/E ratio than NWWCF: AFL (10.95) vs NWWCF (4.82). NWWCF YTD gains are higher at: 147.129 vs. AFL (2.219). AFL has more cash in the bank: 77.6B vs. NWWCF (21B). AFL has less debt than NWWCF: AFL (7.36B) vs NWWCF (11.2B). NWWCF has higher revenues than AFL: NWWCF (219B) vs AFL (18.8B).
AFLNWWCFAFL / NWWCF
Capitalization49.4B16.3B303%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.219147.1292%
P/E Ratio10.954.82227%
Revenue18.8B219B9%
Total Cash77.6B21B370%
Total Debt7.36B11.2B66%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLNWWCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
43%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWWCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCO6.520.04
+0.62%
abrdn Global Income Fund
RSPH29.230.05
+0.15%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Hlth Care ETF
RMOP24.49-0.03
-0.13%
Rockefeller Opportunistic Muncpl Bd ETF
BKGI38.54-0.21
-0.54%
BNY Mellon Global Infras Inc ETF
GLDM66.04-0.43
-0.65%
SPDR® Gold MiniShares

AFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been closely correlated with GL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then GL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFL
1D Price
Change %
AFL100%
+1.01%
GL - AFL
69%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
PRI - AFL
67%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
MET - AFL
66%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
PRU - AFL
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
UNM - AFL
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
More

NWWCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWWCF and AFL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWWCF and AFL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWWCF
1D Price
Change %
NWWCF100%
N/A
AFL - NWWCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
PIAIF - NWWCF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLIF - NWWCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
ELFIF - NWWCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
DCYHY - NWWCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More