AFL vs MET
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a Hold and MET is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AFL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -0.59% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
AFL is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
MET is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (-0.43% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| AFL | MET | AFL / MET | |
| Capitalization | 49.4B | 53.3B | 93% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.685 | -0.428 | 160% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.95 | 40.71 | 27% |
| Revenue | 18.8B | 66.4B | 28% |
| Total Cash | 77.6B | 308B | 25% |
| Total Debt | 7.36B | 18.8B | 39% |
AFL | MET | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MET's Valuation (43) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (60). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.
AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (20). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.
AFL's SMR Rating (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (99). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.
MET's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (54). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.
AFL's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MET (97). This means that AFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.
| AFL | MET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 63% | 26 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 63% |
AFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been loosely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then MET could also see price increases.
MET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.