AFJKU
Price
$12.00
Change
-$2.20 (-15.49%)
Updated
Nov 13, 11:51 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSHP
Price
$10.66
Change
-$0.08 (-0.74%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.97M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFJKU vs FSHP

Header iconAFJKU vs FSHP Comparison
Open Charts AFJKU vs FSHPBanner chart's image
Aimei Health Technology
Price$12.00
Change-$2.20 (-15.49%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Flag Ship Acquisition
Price$10.66
Change-$0.08 (-0.74%)
Volume$1.04K
Capitalization53.97M
AFJKU vs FSHP Comparison Chart in %
AFJKU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFJKU vs. FSHP commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFJKU is a Hold and FSHP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AFJKU: $14.20 vs. FSHP: $10.74)
Brand notoriety: AFJKU and FSHP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFJKU: 107% vs. FSHP: 17%
Market capitalization -- AFJKU: $0 vs. FSHP: $53.97M
AFJKU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. FSHP’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $53.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $175.49M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFJKU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSHP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFJKU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSHP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFJKU is a better buy in the long-term than FSHP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFJKU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AFJKU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

AFJKU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -2.14% price change this week, while FSHP (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +69.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.48% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFJKU YTD gains are higher at: 29.680 vs. FSHP (5.709). FSHP (-1.05M) and AFJKU (-1.06M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . FSHP has more cash in the bank: 19.8K vs. AFJKU (2.14K). FSHP has less debt than AFJKU: FSHP (930K) vs AFJKU (1.21M). AFJKU (0) and FSHP (0) have equivalent revenues.
AFJKUFSHPAFJKU / FSHP
CapitalizationN/A54M-
EBITDA-1.06M-1.05M101%
Gain YTD29.6805.709520%
P/E RatioN/A41.31-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.14K19.8K11%
Total Debt1.21M930K130%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFJKU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFJKU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LST40.240.24
+0.60%
Leuthold Select Industries ETF
VXX32.910.13
+0.40%
iPath® B S&P 500® VIX S/T Futs™ ETN
EUSA103.350.22
+0.22%
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
MARW33.920.04
+0.13%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Mar ETF
HAPY24.53N/A
N/A
Harbor Human Capital Factor Unconstrained ETF

AFJKU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFJKU has been closely correlated with AFJK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFJKU jumps, then AFJK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFJKU
1D Price
Change %
AFJKU100%
+9.06%
AFJK - AFJKU
97%
Closely correlated
+3.35%
ASPCU - AFJKU
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.63%
BACQU - AFJKU
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSPOU - AFJKU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIGGU - AFJKU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSHP and POLE have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSHP and POLE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSHP
1D Price
Change %
FSHP100%
N/A
POLE - FSHP
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
TVACU - FSHP
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
AFJK - FSHP
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
ATMV - FSHP
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
AFJKU - FSHP
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.06%
More