AFJKU
Price
$58.73
Change
-$5.60 (-8.71%)
Updated
Jan 16, 10:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DTSQ
Price
$10.86
Change
-$0.32 (-2.86%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
39.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFJKU vs DTSQ

Header iconAFJKU vs DTSQ Comparison
Open Charts AFJKU vs DTSQBanner chart's image
Aimei Health Technology
Price$58.73
Change-$5.60 (-8.71%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
DT Cloud Star Acquisition
Price$10.86
Change-$0.32 (-2.86%)
Volume$846
Capitalization39.67M
AFJKU vs DTSQ Comparison Chart in %
AFJKU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DTSQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFJKU vs. DTSQ commentary
Jan 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFJKU is a Hold and DTSQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2026
Stock price -- (AFJKU: $64.33 vs. DTSQ: $10.86)
Brand notoriety: AFJKU and DTSQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFJKU: 32% vs. DTSQ: 17%
Market capitalization -- AFJKU: $0 vs. DTSQ: $39.67M
AFJKU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. DTSQ’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $39.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $182.09M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFJKU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDTSQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFJKU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DTSQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFJKU is a better buy in the long-term than DTSQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFJKU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DTSQ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFJKU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DTSQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DTSQ is a better buy in the short-term than AFJKU.

Price Growth

AFJKU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -1.03% price change this week, while DTSQ (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.67% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTSQ YTD gains are higher at: 0.985 vs. AFJKU (-2.530). DTSQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -484.88K vs. AFJKU (-987.19K). DTSQ has more cash in the bank: 20.1K vs. AFJKU (2.98K). DTSQ has less debt than AFJKU: DTSQ (269K) vs AFJKU (1.66M). AFJKU (0) and DTSQ (0) have equivalent revenues.
AFJKUDTSQAFJKU / DTSQ
CapitalizationN/A39.7M-
EBITDA-987.19K-484.88K204%
Gain YTD-2.5300.985-257%
P/E RatioN/A34.24-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.98K20.1K15%
Total Debt1.66M269K615%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFJKUDTSQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
14%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
7%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFJKU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DTSQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BH460.201.26
+0.27%
Biglari Holdings
LIN438.96-1.08
-0.25%
Linde plc
FSTR28.97-0.33
-1.13%
L.B. Foster Company
PHUN1.88-0.03
-1.57%
Phunware
SIRI20.45-0.46
-2.20%
SiriusXM Holdings Inc

AFJKU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFJKU has been closely correlated with AFJK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFJKU jumps, then AFJK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFJKU
1D Price
Change %
AFJKU100%
N/A
AFJK - AFJKU
84%
Closely correlated
+20.04%
DSACU - AFJKU
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ASPCU - AFJKU
33%
Poorly correlated
-11.29%
BACQU - AFJKU
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
TBMC - AFJKU
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
More

DTSQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DTSQ has been loosely correlated with MACI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DTSQ jumps, then MACI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTSQ
1D Price
Change %
DTSQ100%
-2.89%
MACI - DTSQ
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
AFJKU - DTSQ
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RFAI - DTSQ
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EURK - DTSQ
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYCQ - DTSQ
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More