Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPFX
AFGZX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPFX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$31.14
Change-$0.76 (-2.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.08M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.14
Change-$1.23 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
AFGZX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. AFGZX (21.1M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: RNPFX (0.69) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: AFGZX (12 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). AFGZX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPFX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. AFGZX (-8.75). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.27 vs. AFGZX (8.39).
| AFGZX | RNPFX | AFGZX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.46 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.46 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.874 | 21.486 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1M | 165B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.69 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.75 | 14.98 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.93 | 51.80 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.39 | 35.27 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.92 | 103.58 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement