Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPFX
AFGZX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPFX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$32.06
Change-$0.11 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.61M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.03
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
AFGZX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. AFGZX (21.6M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: RNPFX (0.70) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: AFGZX (12 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). AFGZX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPFX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. AFGZX (-5.51). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.47 vs. AFGZX (12.45).
| AFGZX | RNPFX | AFGZX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.46 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.46 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.420 | 19.326 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.6M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.51 | 13.09 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 62.51 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.45 | 36.47 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.36 | 100.70 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement