Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPCX
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPCX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$32.22
Change+$0.13 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.25M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$68.75
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. AFGZX (22.2M). RNPCX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: RNPCX (0.23) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: AFGZX (12 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). AFGZX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.06). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPCX (24.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPCX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.52 vs. AFGZX (2.94). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.38 vs. AFGZX (25.76).
| AFGZX | RNPCX | AFGZX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.06 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.06 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.966 | 14.450 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.2M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.94 | 16.52 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.87 | 43.75 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.76 | 40.38 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.54 | 82.91 | 75% |