Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPCX
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPCX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$29.37
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.58M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$68.64
Change+$0.09 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Hold and RNPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. AFGZX (20.6M). RNPCX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: RNPCX (0.21) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: AFGZX (13 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). AFGZX (2.26) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.06). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPCX (24.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPCX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. AFGZX (-1.67). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.40 vs. AFGZX (-6.49).
| AFGZX | RNPCX | AFGZX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.06 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.06 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.239 | 14.267 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.6M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | 11.59 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.33 | 50.67 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.49 | 19.40 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.92 | 95.18 | 59% |