Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPCX
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPCX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$31.58
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.77M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$71.95
Change+$0.37 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. AFGZX (20.8M). RNPCX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: RNPCX (0.21) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: AFGZX (13 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). AFGZX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.06). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPCX (24.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPCX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.08 vs. AFGZX (-10.14). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.72 vs. AFGZX (3.75).
| AFGZX | RNPCX | AFGZX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.06 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.06 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.645 | 18.828 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.8M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.14 | 11.08 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.42 | 42.83 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.75 | 22.72 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.06 | 88.52 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement