Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPCX
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPCX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$31.73
Change+$0.26 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.19M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$67.75
Change+$0.38 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. AFGZX (22.2M). RNPCX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: RNPCX (0.23) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: AFGZX (12 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). AFGZX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.06). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPCX (24.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPCX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. AFGZX (-2.49). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.51 vs. AFGZX (27.17).
| AFGZX | RNPCX | AFGZX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.06 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.06 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.294 | 12.785 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.2M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.49 | 10.76 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.01 | 45.00 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.17 | 43.51 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.41 | 83.15 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement