Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPCX
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPCX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$30.23
Change-$2.66 (-8.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.2M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$69.20
Change-$2.46 (-3.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Hold and RNPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. AFGZX (20.2M). RNPCX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: RNPCX (0.73) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: AFGZX (13 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). AFGZX (2.26) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.05). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.92 vs. RNPCX (23.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPCX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.39 vs. AFGZX (1.31). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.57 vs. AFGZX (-7.86).
| AFGZX | RNPCX | AFGZX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.05 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.05 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.776 | 1.571 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.2M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.73 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.31 | 12.39 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.49 | 39.55 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.86 | 14.57 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.23 | 122.83 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement