Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPCX
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPCX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$32.06
Change-$0.11 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.61M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$71.36
Change+$0.14 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Hold and RNPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. AFGZX (21.6M). RNPCX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: RNPCX (0.21) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: AFGZX (12 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). AFGZX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.06). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPCX (24.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPCX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. AFGZX (-5.51). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. AFGZX (12.45).
| AFGZX | RNPCX | AFGZX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.06 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.06 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.420 | 18.795 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.6M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.51 | 12.29 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 60.13 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.45 | 32.93 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.36 | 94.63 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement