Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPAX
AFGZX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPAX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$32.39
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.92M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$66.68
Change+$0.35 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.39B
AFGZX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPAX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. AFGZX (21.9M). AFGZX (0.00) and RNPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: AFGZX (12 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). AFGZX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPAX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. AFGZX (-4.26). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.61 vs. AFGZX (20.36).
| AFGZX | RNPAX | AFGZX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.49 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.49 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.546 | 16.921 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.9M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.26 | 9.60 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.21 | 57.78 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.36 | 34.61 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.19 | 99.83 | 86% |