Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs NPFCX
AFGZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs NPFCX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$30.41
Change+$0.31 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.07M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$67.06
Change+$0.11 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
AFGZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. AFGZX (21.1M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: NPFCX (0.35) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: AFGZX (13 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). AFGZX (2.26) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.48). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: NPFCX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. AFGZX (2.49). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.11 vs. AFGZX (-5.03).
| AFGZX | NPFCX | AFGZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.48 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.48 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.394 | 2.366 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.49 | 15.18 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.77 | 42.77 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.03 | 15.11 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.86 | 114.38 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement