AFGVF vs FCHRF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGVF is a Hold and FCHRF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFGVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCHRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AFGVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FCHRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
AFGVF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FCHRF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.50%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (+3.04% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| AFGVF | FCHRF | AFGVF / FCHRF | |
| Capitalization | 399M | 5.6B | 7% |
| EBITDA | -105M | 492M | -21% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 20.12 | - |
| Revenue | 1.88B | 3.99B | 47% |
| Total Cash | 111M | 617M | 18% |
| Total Debt | 86M | 625M | 14% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
AFGVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFGVF has been loosely correlated with RCHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFGVF jumps, then RCHN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFGVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFGVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RCHN - AFGVF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| REOP - AFGVF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RBC - AFGVF | 3% Poorly correlated | +3.72% | ||
| AMROF - AFGVF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FCHRF - AFGVF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
FCHRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCHRF has been loosely correlated with B. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCHRF jumps, then B could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCHRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCHRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| B - FCHRF | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| SDVKF - FCHRF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QUTIF - FCHRF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GTLS - FCHRF | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| RBC - FCHRF | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.72% | ||
More | ||||