AFG
Price
$131.11
Change
-$0.20 (-0.15%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.93B
16 days until earnings call
L
Price
$98.83
Change
+$0.66 (+0.67%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.5B
15 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFG vs L

Header iconAFG vs L Comparison
Open Charts AFG vs LBanner chart's image
American Financial Group
Price$131.11
Change-$0.20 (-0.15%)
Volume$385.31K
Capitalization10.93B
Loews
Price$98.83
Change+$0.66 (+0.67%)
Volume$665.63K
Capitalization20.5B
AFG vs L Comparison Chart in %
AFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFG vs. L commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFG is a Hold and L is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AFG: $131.11 vs. L: $98.83)
Brand notoriety: AFG and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFG: 83% vs. L: 84%
Market capitalization -- AFG: $10.93B vs. L: $20.5B
AFG [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $10.93B. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $20.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $132.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFG is a better buy in the long-term than L.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFG is a better buy in the short-term than L.

Price Growth

AFG (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -4.08% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.11% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($20.5B) has a higher market cap than AFG($10.9B). L has higher P/E ratio than AFG: L (15.69) vs AFG (14.39). L YTD gains are higher at: 16.940 vs. AFG (-0.271). AFG has less debt than L: AFG (1.48B) vs L (8.95B). L has higher revenues than AFG: L (17.8B) vs AFG (8.28B).
AFGLAFG / L
Capitalization10.9B20.5B53%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.27116.940-2%
P/E Ratio14.3915.6992%
Revenue8.28B17.8B47%
Total CashN/A6.51B-
Total Debt1.48B8.95B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFG vs L: Fundamental Ratings
AFG
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7834
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
7697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5734
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3519
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFG's Valuation (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (72). This means that AFG’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (9). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.

AFG's SMR Rating (76) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97). This means that AFG’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (57). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (35). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMOT35.860.14
+0.39%
VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF
MMLG35.750.01
+0.03%
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF
EQRR62.33N/A
N/A
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
QQHG58.30N/A
N/A
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
TY33.71-0.07
-0.21%
TRI-Continental Corp

AFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFG has been closely correlated with AXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFG jumps, then AXS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFG
1D Price
Change %
AFG100%
-0.15%
AXS - AFG
74%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
ORI - AFG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
HIG - AFG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
L - AFG
69%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
CINF - AFG
68%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
More

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.67%
HIG - L
85%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
CINF - L
83%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
ORI - L
79%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
THG - L
78%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
More