Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFDZX vs SSGSX
AFDZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts AFDZX vs SSGSX
Applied Finance Explorer Institutional
Price$23.32
Change-$0.43 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets917.99M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
AFDZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFDZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFDZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. AFDZX (918M). AFDZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: AFDZX (1.02) vs SSGSX (0.49). AFDZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: AFDZX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). AFDZX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). AFDZX (37.29) and SSGSX (37.00) have comparable annual turnover. SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFDZX: SSGSX (2500) vs AFDZX (10000). AFDZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.23 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). AFDZX return over 5 years is better than : 94.46 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| AFDZX | SSGSX | AFDZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.26 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.398 | -0.129 | -6,498% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 918M | 5.23B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.49 | 211% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.23 | -12.62 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.66 | -6.25 | -570% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.46 | 8.71 | 1,084% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.77 | 20.45 | 820% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement