Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFDZX vs SSGSX
AFDZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts AFDZX vs SSGSX
Applied Finance Explorer Institutional
Price$23.16
Change-$0.21 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets904.04M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
AFDZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFDZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFDZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. AFDZX (904M). AFDZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: AFDZX (1.09) vs SSGSX (0.50). AFDZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: AFDZX (10 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). AFDZX (1.37) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AFDZX (32.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFDZX: SSGSX (2500) vs AFDZX (10000). AFDZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.86 vs. SSGSX (-5.53). AFDZX return over 5 years is better than : 106.63 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| AFDZX | SSGSX | AFDZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.26 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.705 | -2.025 | -282% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 904M | 5.5B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.50 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | -5.53 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.73 | -9.76 | -264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.63 | 15.88 | 672% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.50 | 15.23 | 969% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers