Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFDVX vs SSGSX
AFDVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts AFDVX vs SSGSX
Applied Finance Explorer Investor
Price$23.10
Change-$0.43 (-1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets917.99M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
AFDVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFDVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFDVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. AFDVX (918M). AFDVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: AFDVX (0.86) vs SSGSX (0.49). AFDVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: AFDVX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). AFDVX (1.68) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). AFDVX (37.29) and SSGSX (37.00) have comparable annual turnover. AFDVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: AFDVX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). AFDVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.21 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). AFDVX return over 5 years is better than : 88.96 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| AFDVX | SSGSX | AFDVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.26 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.26 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.207 | -0.129 | -4,803% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 918M | 5.23B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.49 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.21 | -12.62 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.42 | -6.25 | -534% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.96 | 8.71 | 1,021% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.93 | 20.45 | 758% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement