Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFCNX vs RERAX
AFCNX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts AFCNX vs RERAX
American Century Focused Intl Gr I
Price$18.85
Change-$0.24 (-1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.08M
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$61.37
Change-$1.05 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
AFCNX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFCNX vs. RERAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFCNX is a Hold and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. AFCNX (158M). RERAX pays higher dividends than AFCNX: RERAX (0.22) vs AFCNX (0.00). AFCNX was incepted earlier than RERAX: AFCNX (10 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than AFCNX (1.09). AFCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RERAX (35.00). RERAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFCNX: RERAX (250) vs AFCNX (2500). RERAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.94 vs. AFCNX (12.94). RERAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.15 vs. AFCNX (5.57).
| AFCNX | RERAX | AFCNX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.57 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.57 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.150 | 23.776 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.94 | 15.94 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.90 | 33.97 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.57 | 6.15 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement