It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFBI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFUSB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFBI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AFBI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.28% price change this week, while FUSB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.02%.
AFBI is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2023.
FUSB is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
AFBI | FUSB | AFBI / FUSB | |
Capitalization | 106M | 53.6M | 198% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 34.252 | 19.720 | 174% |
P/E Ratio | 16.34 | 6.65 | 246% |
Revenue | 29.7M | 40.7M | 73% |
Total Cash | N/A | 10.3M | - |
Total Debt | 40M | 20.8M | 192% |
AFBI | FUSB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUSB's Valuation (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFBI (79) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFBI’s over the last 12 months.
AFBI's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUSB (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AFBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUSB’s over the last 12 months.
FUSB's SMR Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AFBI (67) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew similarly to AFBI’s over the last 12 months.
FUSB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AFBI (45) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew similarly to AFBI’s over the last 12 months.
AFBI's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as FUSB (33) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AFBI’s stock grew similarly to FUSB’s over the last 12 months.
AFBI | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago32% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago31% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago36% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFBI has been loosely correlated with RBAZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFBI jumps, then RBAZ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFBI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AFBI | 100% | -0.28% | ||
RBAZ - AFBI | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
EBSH - AFBI | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
BKEAF - AFBI | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
FHN - AFBI | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
RVSB - AFBI | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FUSB and AFBI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUSB and AFBI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUSB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FUSB | 100% | -2.25% | ||
AFBI - FUSB | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
NSTS - FUSB | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
MGYR - FUSB | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.37% | ||
HFBL - FUSB | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
KFFB - FUSB | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.38% | ||
More |