Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFAVX vs JVMCX
AFAVX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts AFAVX vs JVMCX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value I
Price$12.97
Change-$1.24 (-8.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.46M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.89
Change-$0.78 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.66B
AFAVX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFAVX vs. JVMCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFAVX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. AFAVX (49.5M). AFAVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: AFAVX (1.00) vs JVMCX (0.00). AFAVX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: AFAVX (10 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than AFAVX (1.02). AFAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFAVX: JVMCX (1000) vs AFAVX (100000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.34 vs. AFAVX (-1.82). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.97 vs. AFAVX (0.57).
| AFAVX | JVMCX | AFAVX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.85 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.86 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.841 | 5.121 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.5M | 24.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | 3.34 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.00 | 6.94 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.57 | 15.97 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.35 | 61.82 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement