It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEXAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCTLP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTLP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AEXAF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -48.05% price change this week, while CTLP (@Information Technology Services) price change was -4.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.60%.
CTLP is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
AEXAF | CTLP | AEXAF / CTLP | |
Capitalization | 4.75B | 652M | 729% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -95.032 | 20.513 | -463% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 52.53 | - |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
AEXAF | CTLP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 74 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AEXAF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTLP (91) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that AEXAF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTLP’s over the last 12 months.
CTLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as AEXAF (100) in the null industry. This means that CTLP’s stock grew similarly to AEXAF’s over the last 12 months.
CTLP's SMR Rating (74) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as AEXAF (97) in the null industry. This means that CTLP’s stock grew similarly to AEXAF’s over the last 12 months.
CTLP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEXAF (97) in the null industry. This means that CTLP’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEXAF’s over the last 12 months.
AEXAF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTLP (47) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that AEXAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTLP’s over the last 12 months.
CTLP | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago0% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEXAF has been loosely correlated with AEXAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEXAF jumps, then AEXAY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEXAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AEXAF | 100% | -19.00% | ||
AEXAY - AEXAF | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
CCCMF - AEXAF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CTLP - AEXAF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.83% | ||
INOD - AEXAF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
ALYAF - AEXAF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTLP has been loosely correlated with IBEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTLP jumps, then IBEX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTLP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CTLP | 100% | -2.83% | ||
IBEX - CTLP | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
ASGN - CTLP | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.78% | ||
EXLS - CTLP | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
UIS - CTLP | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.94% | ||
CNDT - CTLP | 34% Loosely correlated | -5.15% | ||
More |