AEVIF
Price
$20.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 27 closing price
BUHPF
Price
$6.93
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 9 closing price
Ad is loading...

AEVIF vs BUHPF

Header iconAEVIF vs BUHPF Comparison
Open Charts AEVIF vs BUHPFBanner chart's image
Aevis Victoria SA
Price$20.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.25K
CapitalizationN/A
Bumrungrad Hospital Public
Price$6.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
AEVIF vs BUHPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEVIF vs. BUHPF commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEVIF is a Hold and BUHPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (AEVIF: $20.00 vs. BUHPF: $6.93)
Brand notoriety: AEVIF and BUHPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEVIF: 100% vs. BUHPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AEVIF: $1.79B vs. BUHPF: $5.01B
AEVIF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $1.79B. BUHPF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $5.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $3.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEVIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBUHPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEVIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BUHPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUHPF is a better buy in the long-term than AEVIF.

Price Growth

AEVIF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BUHPF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1669.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-4.80% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUHPF($5.01B) has a higher market cap than AEVIF($1.79B). BUHPF has higher P/E ratio than AEVIF: BUHPF (38.46) vs AEVIF (25.51). BUHPF YTD gains are higher at: 14.356 vs. AEVIF (0.000). BUHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.17B vs. AEVIF (122M). BUHPF has more cash in the bank: 9.85B vs. AEVIF (69.2M). BUHPF has less debt than AEVIF: BUHPF (58M) vs AEVIF (161M). BUHPF has higher revenues than AEVIF: BUHPF (20.7B) vs AEVIF (1.04B).
AEVIFBUHPFAEVIF / BUHPF
Capitalization1.79B5.01B36%
EBITDA122M7.17B2%
Gain YTD0.00014.356-
P/E Ratio25.5138.4666%
Revenue1.04B20.7B5%
Total Cash69.2M9.85B1%
Total Debt161M58M278%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUHPF: Fundamental Ratings
BUHPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21
SMR RATING
1..100
38
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

AEVIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEVIF has been loosely correlated with BTMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEVIF jumps, then BTMD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEVIF
1D Price
Change %
AEVIF100%
N/A
BTMD - AEVIF
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
RHE - AEVIF
26%
Poorly correlated
+6.87%
LFST - AEVIF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
CMPS - AEVIF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
PIII - AEVIF
7%
Poorly correlated
-16.21%
More

BUHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BUHPF and FSNUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUHPF and FSNUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUHPF
1D Price
Change %
BUHPF100%
N/A
FSNUF - BUHPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIII - BUHPF
10%
Poorly correlated
-16.21%
AIRS - BUHPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.07%
NUMIF - BUHPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-28.34%
AEVIF - BUHPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More