AETUF
Price
$19.60
Change
-$0.35 (-1.75%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.18B
5 days until earnings call
CDDRF
Price
$5.29
Change
-$0.12 (-2.22%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AETUF vs CDDRF

Header iconAETUF vs CDDRF Comparison
Open Charts AETUF vs CDDRFBanner chart's image
Arc Resources
Price$19.60
Change-$0.35 (-1.75%)
Volume$18.76K
Capitalization9.18B
HEADWATER EXPL
Price$5.29
Change-$0.12 (-2.22%)
Volume$20.95K
Capitalization1.34B
AETUF vs CDDRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AETUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AETUF vs. CDDRF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AETUF is a Hold and CDDRF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AETUF: $19.60 vs. CDDRF: $5.29)
Brand notoriety: AETUF and CDDRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AETUF: 99% vs. CDDRF: 56%
Market capitalization -- AETUF: $9.18B vs. CDDRF: $1.34B
AETUF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $9.18B. CDDRF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $1.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AETUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDDRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AETUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDDRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDDRF is a better buy in the long-term than AETUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AETUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDDRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AETUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CDDRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDDRF is a better buy in the short-term than AETUF.

Price Growth

AETUF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while CDDRF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

AETUF is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+1.28% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AETUF($9.19B) has a higher market cap than CDDRF($1.34B). CDDRF has higher P/E ratio than AETUF: CDDRF (11.67) vs AETUF (4.39). CDDRF YTD gains are higher at: 15.294 vs. AETUF (8.220). AETUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.24B vs. CDDRF (325M). CDDRF has more cash in the bank: 146M vs. AETUF (4.4M). CDDRF has less debt than AETUF: CDDRF (842K) vs AETUF (1.93B). AETUF has higher revenues than CDDRF: AETUF (9.51B) vs CDDRF (511M).
AETUFCDDRFAETUF / CDDRF
Capitalization9.19B1.34B685%
EBITDA5.24B325M1,613%
Gain YTD8.22015.29454%
P/E Ratio4.3911.6738%
Revenue9.51B511M1,861%
Total Cash4.4M146M3%
Total Debt1.93B842K229,097%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AETUF vs CDDRF: Fundamental Ratings
AETUF
CDDRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5026
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1528
SMR RATING
1..100
5033
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5369
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDDRF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as AETUF (40). This means that CDDRF’s stock grew similarly to AETUF’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as CDDRF (28). This means that AETUF’s stock grew similarly to CDDRF’s over the last 12 months.

CDDRF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as AETUF (50). This means that CDDRF’s stock grew similarly to AETUF’s over the last 12 months.

CDDRF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as AETUF (56). This means that CDDRF’s stock grew similarly to AETUF’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CDDRF (69). This means that AETUF’s stock grew similarly to CDDRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AETUFCDDRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AETUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMOYX26.220.30
+1.16%
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Y
NDVTX17.910.13
+0.73%
MFS New Discovery Value R3
DEOPX25.750.15
+0.59%
Davenport Equity Opportunities
VHCAX206.900.60
+0.29%
Vanguard Capital Opportunity Adm
FIDAX19.270.02
+0.10%
JHancock Financial Industries A

AETUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AETUF has been closely correlated with TRMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AETUF jumps, then TRMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AETUF
1D Price
Change %
AETUF100%
-1.74%
TRMLF - AETUF
70%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
CRLFF - AETUF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
MEGEF - AETUF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
PEYUF - AETUF
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
TNEYF - AETUF
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
More

CDDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDDRF has been closely correlated with TNEYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDDRF jumps, then TNEYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDDRF
1D Price
Change %
CDDRF100%
-2.18%
TNEYF - CDDRF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
MEGEF - CDDRF
71%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
ZPTAF - CDDRF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
AETUF - CDDRF
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
ATHOF - CDDRF
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
More