AEPLF
Price
$17.35
Change
+$0.85 (+5.15%)
Updated
Oct 13 closing price
Capitalization
673.12M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SLCJY
Price
$2.97
Change
+$0.03 (+1.02%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.28B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEPLF vs SLCJY

Header iconAEPLF vs SLCJY Comparison
Open Charts AEPLF vs SLCJYBanner chart's image
Anglo Eastern Plantation
Price$17.35
Change+$0.85 (+5.15%)
Volume$515
Capitalization673.12M
SLC Agricola Sa
Price$2.97
Change+$0.03 (+1.02%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization1.28B
AEPLF vs SLCJY Comparison Chart in %
AEPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLCJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEPLF vs. SLCJY commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPLF is a Hold and SLCJY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (AEPLF: $16.98 vs. SLCJY: $2.97)
Brand notoriety: AEPLF and SLCJY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEPLF: 112% vs. SLCJY: 18%
Market capitalization -- AEPLF: $673.12M vs. SLCJY: $1.28B
AEPLF [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $673.12M. SLCJY’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $1.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEPLF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLCJY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AEPLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLCJY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AEPLF is a better buy in the long-term than SLCJY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEPLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLCJY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEPLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLCJY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEPLF is a better buy in the short-term than SLCJY.

Price Growth

AEPLF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLCJY (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was +0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+2.05% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLCJY($1.28B) has a higher market cap than AEPLF($673M). SLCJY has higher P/E ratio than AEPLF: SLCJY (12.05) vs AEPLF (7.75). AEPLF YTD gains are higher at: 113.963 vs. SLCJY (13.043). SLCJY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.37B vs. AEPLF (136M). SLCJY has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. AEPLF (71.5M). AEPLF has less debt than SLCJY: AEPLF (641K) vs SLCJY (10.1B). SLCJY has higher revenues than AEPLF: SLCJY (8.79B) vs AEPLF (437M).
AEPLFSLCJYAEPLF / SLCJY
Capitalization673M1.28B52%
EBITDA136M2.37B6%
Gain YTD113.96313.043874%
P/E Ratio7.7512.0564%
Revenue437M8.79B5%
Total Cash71.5M1.15B6%
Total Debt641K10.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEPLF vs SLCJY: Fundamental Ratings
AEPLF
SLCJY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
355
SMR RATING
1..100
5164
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3763
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1965
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AEPLF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SLCJY (24). This means that AEPLF’s stock grew similarly to SLCJY’s over the last 12 months.

AEPLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLCJY (55). This means that AEPLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLCJY’s over the last 12 months.

AEPLF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SLCJY (64). This means that AEPLF’s stock grew similarly to SLCJY’s over the last 12 months.

AEPLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SLCJY (63). This means that AEPLF’s stock grew similarly to SLCJY’s over the last 12 months.

AEPLF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLCJY (65). This means that AEPLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLCJY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEPLFSLCJY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
17%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLCJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGAAX23.690.26
+1.11%
Virtus SGA Global Growth A
ACFOX81.790.86
+1.06%
American Century Focused Dynamic Gr Inv
MCLVX27.520.28
+1.03%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Val Inv C
MUNDX29.450.30
+1.03%
Mundoval
NLSAX19.750.11
+0.56%
Neuberger Berman Long Short A

SLCJY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLCJY and BG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLCJY and BG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLCJY
1D Price
Change %
SLCJY100%
+1.02%
BG - SLCJY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
ADM - SLCJY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
SALRY - SLCJY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
MHGVY - SLCJY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
AGRI - SLCJY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
More