Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPGX vs FZABX
AEPGX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPGX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC A
Price$63.88
Change+$0.20 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.4B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.63
Change+$0.27 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
AEPGX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPGX vs. FZABX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPGX is a Buy and FZABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPGX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.55B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPGX: FZABX (1.64) vs AEPGX (0.68). AEPGX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPGX (41 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPGX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). AEPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPGX: FZABX (0) vs AEPGX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. AEPGX (5.68). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 23.61 vs. AEPGX (16.63).
| AEPGX | FZABX | AEPGX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.73 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.73 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.913 | 21.019 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 1.55B | 8,721% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.68 | 6.02 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.97 | 60.48 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.63 | 23.61 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.46 | 71.44 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement