Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPGX vs FZABX
AEPGX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPGX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC A
Price$63.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$29.43
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
AEPGX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPGX vs. FZABX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPGX is a Hold and FZABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPGX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.65B). AEPGX pays higher dividends than FZABX: AEPGX (2.73) vs FZABX (1.71). AEPGX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPGX (42 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPGX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AEPGX (35.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPGX: FZABX (0) vs AEPGX (250). AEPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.97 vs. FZABX (18.23). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 5.48 vs. AEPGX (-4.02).
| AEPGX | FZABX | AEPGX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.73 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.73 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.412 | 3.637 | 121% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 1.65B | 8,162% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 1.71 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.97 | 18.23 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.89 | 28.85 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.02 | 5.48 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.69 | 73.72 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement