Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPFX vs TRNZX
AEPFX vs TRNZX Comparison
Open Charts AEPFX vs TRNZX
American Funds EUPAC F2
Price$63.77
Change-$1.68 (-2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
T. Rowe Price International Stock Z
Price$21.74
Change-$1.50 (-6.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.56B
AEPFX vs TRNZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPFX vs. TRNZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPFX is a Hold and TRNZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. TRNZX (13.6B). TRNZX pays higher dividends than AEPFX: TRNZX (3.02) vs AEPFX (2.77). AEPFX was incepted earlier than TRNZX: AEPFX (18 years) vs TRNZX (6 years). TRNZX (0.66) is less costly to investors than AEPFX (0.58). TRNZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.20 vs. AEPFX (35.00). TRNZX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPFX: TRNZX (0) vs AEPFX (250). AEPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.64 vs. TRNZX (12.86). TRNZX return over 5 years is better than : 9.76 vs. AEPFX (-1.75).
| AEPFX | TRNZX | AEPFX / TRNZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.66 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.667 | 4.119 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 13.6B | 993% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 3.02 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.64 | 12.86 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.58 | 28.53 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.75 | 9.76 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement