Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPFX vs HNCCX
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F2
Price$65.86
Change-$1.13 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$18.93
Change-$0.45 (-2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets383.01M
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPFX is a Buy and HNCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. HNCCX (383M). AEPFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEPFX (0.80) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEPFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEPFX (17 years) vs HNCCX (25 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEPFX (0.58). AEPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEPFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.67 vs. AEPFX (16.41). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.58 vs. AEPFX (11.50).
| AEPFX | HNCCX | AEPFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.05 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.965 | 27.921 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 383M | 36,292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.41 | 27.67 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.57 | 55.54 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.50 | 21.58 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.43 | 75.33 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement