Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPFX vs HNCCX
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F2
Price$61.40
Change-$0.32 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$18.17
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.09M
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPFX is a Hold and HNCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. HNCCX (341M). AEPFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEPFX (0.87) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEPFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEPFX (17 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEPFX (0.58). AEPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEPFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.77 vs. AEPFX (10.06). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.09 vs. AEPFX (17.85).
| AEPFX | HNCCX | AEPFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.05 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.638 | 19.934 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 341M | 39,589% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 22.77 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.51 | 54.24 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.85 | 26.09 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.74 | 52.69 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement