Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPFX vs HNCCX
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F2
Price$65.19
Change-$0.28 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$18.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.95M
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPFX is a Hold and HNCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. HNCCX (367M). AEPFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEPFX (0.82) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEPFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEPFX (17 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEPFX (0.58). AEPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEPFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.26 vs. AEPFX (11.34). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.29 vs. AEPFX (16.92).
| AEPFX | HNCCX | AEPFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.05 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.714 | 25.083 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 367M | 37,602% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.34 | 22.26 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.66 | 79.62 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.92 | 23.29 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.44 | 68.11 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement