Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPFX vs CCWSX
AEPFX vs CCWSX Comparison
Open Charts AEPFX vs CCWSX
American Funds EUPAC F2
Price$65.71
Change+$0.52 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
Baird Chautauqua International Gr I
Price$22.07
Change+$0.08 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
AEPFX vs CCWSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPFX vs. CCWSX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPFX is a Buy and CCWSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. CCWSX (1.51B). AEPFX pays higher dividends than CCWSX: AEPFX (0.81) vs CCWSX (0.38). AEPFX was incepted earlier than CCWSX: AEPFX (17 years) vs CCWSX (10 years). CCWSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than AEPFX (0.58). AEPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CCWSX (18.00). AEPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWSX: AEPFX (250) vs CCWSX (2500). AEPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.96 vs. CCWSX (11.73). CCWSX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. AEPFX (5.43).
| AEPFX | CCWSX | AEPFX / CCWSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.05 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.685 | 17.707 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 1.51B | 8,851% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.38 | 214% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.96 | 11.73 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.48 | 40.28 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.43 | 32.96 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers