Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs NBNRX
AEPCX vs NBNRX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNRX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$62.33
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.06B
Neuberger Berman International Sel R3
Price$14.97
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.94M
AEPCX vs NBNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and NBNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. NBNRX (247M). NBNRX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: NBNRX (0.65) vs AEPCX (0.16). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNRX: AEPCX (25 years) vs NBNRX (16 years). NBNRX (1.61) and AEPCX (1.57) have similar cost to investors . NBNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). NBNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: NBNRX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. NBNRX (7.87). NBNRX return over 5 years is better than : 12.22 vs. AEPCX (9.92).
| AEPCX | NBNRX | AEPCX / NBNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.41 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.61 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.631 | 17.136 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 247M | 55,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.65 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.02 | 7.87 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.85 | 43.03 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.92 | 12.22 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.76 | 47.47 | 77% |