Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs NBNAX
AEPCX vs NBNAX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNAX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$57.85
Change+$0.14 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
Neuberger International Sel A
Price$15.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.47M
AEPCX vs NBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and NBNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. NBNAX (238M). NBNAX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: NBNAX (0.79) vs AEPCX (0.15). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNAX: AEPCX (25 years) vs NBNAX (18 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NBNAX (1.34). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: AEPCX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). NBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.37 vs. AEPCX (10.87). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.06 vs. AEPCX (-10.58).
| AEPCX | NBNAX | AEPCX / NBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.16 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.34 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.961 | 17.183 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 238M | 56,303% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.79 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.87 | 16.37 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.83 | 35.28 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.58 | 5.06 | -209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.22 | 49.21 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers