Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$60.98
Change-$1.60 (-2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.03
Change-$1.23 (-3.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FZABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.74B). AEPCX pays higher dividends than FZABX: AEPCX (2.16) vs FZABX (1.63). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.72). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX (16.92) and FZABX (16.25) have marching annual gain over last year. FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 7.42 vs. AEPCX (-7.96).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.72 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.72 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.557 | 6.215 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 1.74B | 7,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 1.63 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.92 | 16.25 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.95 | 29.14 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.96 | 7.42 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.40 | 78.53 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement