Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$62.92
Change-$1.08 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$31.59
Change-$0.42 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FZABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FZABX (1.63B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FZABX (1.56) vs AEPCX (0.15). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.26 vs. AEPCX (15.01). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 20.53 vs. AEPCX (4.82).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.773 | 25.800 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 1.63B | 8,528% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.56 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.01 | 17.26 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.22 | 42.33 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.82 | 20.53 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.49 | 68.49 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement