Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$60.29
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$29.43
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FZABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.65B). AEPCX pays higher dividends than FZABX: AEPCX (2.26) vs FZABX (1.71). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.49 vs. FZABX (18.23). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 5.48 vs. AEPCX (-7.96).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.362 | 3.637 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 1.65B | 8,162% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 1.71 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.49 | 18.23 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.14 | 28.85 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.96 | 5.48 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.30 | 73.72 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement