Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FNGZX
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FNGZX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$62.74
Change+$0.49 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
Price$18.08
Change+$0.19 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets744.92M
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FNGZX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FNGZX (745M). FNGZX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FNGZX (1.88) vs AEPCX (0.15). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FNGZX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FNGZX (18 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FNGZX (0.95). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNGZX (17.56). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGZX: AEPCX (250) vs FNGZX (100000). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. FNGZX (3.71). AEPCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.08 vs. FNGZX (-12.29).
| AEPCX | FNGZX | AEPCX / FNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.87 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.95 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.244 | 9.002 | 225% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 745M | 17,987% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.88 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.33 | 3.71 | 305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.09 | 16.03 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.08 | -12.29 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.52 | 68.64 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement