Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FNGZX
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FNGZX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$59.54
Change-$0.13 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.75B
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
Price$18.30
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets846.68M
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FNGZX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FNGZX (847M). FNGZX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FNGZX (1.85) vs AEPCX (0.17). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FNGZX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FNGZX (17 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FNGZX (0.95). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNGZX (17.56). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGZX: AEPCX (250) vs FNGZX (100000). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.72 vs. FNGZX (5.42). AEPCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.99 vs. FNGZX (-2.22).
| AEPCX | FNGZX | AEPCX / FNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.87 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.95 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.483 | 12.064 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 847M | 16,057% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.85 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | 5.42 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.37 | 23.63 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.99 | -2.22 | -360% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.41 | 81.69 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement