Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FCIWX
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$58.83
Change-$0.31 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.57
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.61M
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FCIWX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FCIWX (879M). FCIWX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FCIWX (0.63) vs AEPCX (0.17). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIWX (0.89). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. FCIWX (5.77). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 45.45 vs. AEPCX (10.77).
| AEPCX | FCIWX | AEPCX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.80 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.857 | 7.858 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 879M | 15,358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.63 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 5.77 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.41 | 38.30 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.77 | 45.45 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement