Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FCIWX
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$59.54
Change-$0.13 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.75B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.43
Change+$0.12 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets828.73M
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FCIWX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FCIWX (829M). FCIWX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FCIWX (0.66) vs AEPCX (0.17). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIWX (0.89). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.72 vs. FCIWX (0.65). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 39.29 vs. AEPCX (7.99).
| AEPCX | FCIWX | AEPCX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.80 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.483 | 6.262 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 829M | 16,405% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.66 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | 0.65 | 1,032% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.37 | 33.19 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.99 | 39.29 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement