Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FCIWX
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$60.98
Change-$1.60 (-2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.75
Change-$0.06 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets711.02M
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FCIWX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FCIWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FCIWX (711M). AEPCX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: AEPCX (2.16) vs FCIWX (0.90). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIWX (0.89). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (25.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.92 vs. FCIWX (6.18). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 28.54 vs. AEPCX (-7.96).
| AEPCX | FCIWX | AEPCX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.80 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.557 | -1.114 | -499% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 711M | 18,987% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 0.90 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.92 | 6.18 | 274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.95 | 25.20 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.96 | 28.54 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers