Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FCIWX
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$59.85
Change+$0.41 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.54
Change+$0.30 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets778M
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FCIWX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FCIWX (778M). FCIWX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FCIWX (0.64) vs AEPCX (0.16). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIWX (0.89). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. FCIWX (3.18). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 40.81 vs. AEPCX (8.91).
| AEPCX | FCIWX | AEPCX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.80 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.831 | 7.673 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 778M | 17,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.64 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.10 | 3.18 | 318% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.24 | 41.21 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.91 | 40.81 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement