Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FCIWX
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$56.50
Change-$0.76 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.51
Change-$0.34 (-1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets870.77M
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FCIWX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FCIWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FCIWX (871M). FCIWX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FCIWX (0.64) vs AEPCX (0.32). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). AEPCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FCIWX (0.89). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIWX (12.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. FCIWX (1.93). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 58.38 vs. AEPCX (14.79).
| AEPCX | FCIWX | AEPCX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.80 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.89 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.348 | 7.489 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 871M | 15,270% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.64 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 1.93 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.34 | 49.17 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.79 | 58.38 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement