Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FCIWX
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$62.33
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.06B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$18.24
Change+$0.12 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets784.68M
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FCIWX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FCIWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FCIWX (785M). FCIWX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FCIWX (0.63) vs AEPCX (0.16). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIWX (0.89). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. FCIWX (4.91). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 42.24 vs. AEPCX (9.92).
| AEPCX | FCIWX | AEPCX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.80 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.631 | 11.971 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 785M | 17,452% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.63 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.02 | 4.91 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.85 | 58.29 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.92 | 42.24 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement