Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FCIWX
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$62.99
Change-$0.42 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.65
Change-$0.09 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets745.53M
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FCIWX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FCIWX (746M). FCIWX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FCIWX (0.62) vs AEPCX (0.15). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIWX (0.89). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.76 vs. FCIWX (4.54). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 31.14 vs. AEPCX (0.22).
| AEPCX | FCIWX | AEPCX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.80 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.721 | 8.901 | 255% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 746M | 17,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.62 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.76 | 4.54 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.75 | 32.32 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.22 | 31.14 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement