Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FCIWX
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$62.92
Change-$1.08 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.91
Change-$0.18 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets758.11M
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FCIWX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FCIWX (758M). FCIWX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FCIWX (0.62) vs AEPCX (0.15). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIWX (0.89). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.01 vs. FCIWX (9.55). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 35.96 vs. AEPCX (4.82).
| AEPCX | FCIWX | AEPCX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.80 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.773 | 11.050 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 758M | 18,338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.62 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.01 | 9.55 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.22 | 38.77 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.82 | 35.96 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement