AEOJF
Price
$8.57
Change
+$0.82 (+10.58%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
R
Price
$188.64
Change
+$2.59 (+1.39%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.69B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEOJF vs R

Header iconAEOJF vs R Comparison
Open Charts AEOJF vs RBanner chart's image
Aeon Financial Services
Price$8.57
Change+$0.82 (+10.58%)
Volume$102
Capitalization2.2B
Ryder System
Price$188.64
Change+$2.59 (+1.39%)
Volume$353.77K
Capitalization7.69B
AEOJF vs R Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEOJF vs. R commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEOJF is a Buy and R is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (AEOJF: $8.57 vs. R: $188.64)
Brand notoriety: AEOJF and R are both not notable
AEOJF represents the Savings Banks, while R is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEOJF: 101% vs. R: 101%
Market capitalization -- AEOJF: $2.2B vs. R: $7.69B
AEOJF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $2.2B. R’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $7.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.25B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $62.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.54B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEOJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AEOJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • R’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, R is a better buy in the long-term than AEOJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

R’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • R’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

AEOJF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while R (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.47%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

R is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.51% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.23% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
R($7.7B) has a higher market cap than AEOJF($2.2B). R (16.04) and AEOJF (15.44) have similar P/E ratio . R YTD gains are higher at: 22.087 vs. AEOJF (10.581). R has less debt than AEOJF: R (8.72B) vs AEOJF (1.22T).
AEOJFRAEOJF / R
Capitalization2.2B7.7B29%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.58122.08748%
P/E Ratio15.4416.0496%
Revenue433BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.22T8.72B13,966%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
R: Fundamental Ratings
R
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEOJFR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STXM27.980.36
+1.31%
Strive Mid-Cap ETF
FDFF37.110.23
+0.62%
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF
ALLW26.960.11
+0.41%
SPDR Bridgewater ALL Weather ETF
LGI17.670.07
+0.40%
Lazard Global Total Return & Income Fund
GSST50.49N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF

AEOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEOJF has been loosely correlated with FDCHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEOJF jumps, then FDCHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEOJF
1D Price
Change %
AEOJF100%
N/A
FDCHF - AEOJF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
URI - AEOJF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
AXP - AEOJF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
R - AEOJF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
FINV - AEOJF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
More

R and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, R has been closely correlated with OMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if R jumps, then OMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To R
1D Price
Change %
R100%
+1.39%
OMF - R
72%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
URI - R
72%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
SYF - R
71%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
COF - R
67%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
ENVA - R
67%
Closely correlated
+2.84%
More