AEM
Price
$198.70
Change
+$1.35 (+0.68%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
98.71B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WRLGF
Price
$0.88
Change
+$0.16 (+22.22%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
347.75M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs WRLGF

Header iconAEM vs WRLGF Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs WRLGFBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$198.70
Change+$1.35 (+0.68%)
Volume$35.19K
Capitalization98.71B
West Red Lake Gold Mines
Price$0.88
Change+$0.16 (+22.22%)
Volume$1.89M
Capitalization347.75M
AEM vs WRLGF Comparison Chart in %
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WRLGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. WRLGF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and WRLGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (AEM: $197.35 vs. WRLGF: $0.88)
Brand notoriety: AEM and WRLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 129% vs. WRLGF: 191%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $98.71B vs. WRLGF: $347.75M
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $98.71B. WRLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $347.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $146.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWRLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WRLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the long-term than WRLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRLGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WRLGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AEM and WRLGF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -8.70% price change this week, while WRLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +95.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.43% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($98.7B) has a higher market cap than WRLGF($348M). WRLGF YTD gains are higher at: 18.521 vs. AEM (16.410). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.84B vs. WRLGF (-79.23M). AEM has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. WRLGF (45.8M). WRLGF has less debt than AEM: WRLGF (113M) vs AEM (336M). AEM has higher revenues than WRLGF: AEM (10.6B) vs WRLGF (0).
AEMWRLGFAEM / WRLGF
Capitalization98.7B348M28,362%
EBITDA6.84B-79.23M-8,636%
Gain YTD16.41018.52189%
P/E Ratio28.85N/A-
Revenue10.6B0-
Total Cash2.36B45.8M5,142%
Total Debt336M113M297%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMWRLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WRLGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GABOX16.540.13
+0.79%
Gabelli International Small Cap AAA
ACMVX15.550.09
+0.58%
American Century Mid Cap Value Inv
ESMCX11.810.02
+0.17%
Invesco Global Small Cap Equity C
GTSVX39.98-0.14
-0.35%
Invesco Small Cap Growth R5
HRCUX67.98-1.05
-1.52%
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec R6

AEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEM
1D Price
Change %
AEM100%
+3.42%
WPM - AEM
92%
Closely correlated
+3.46%
FNV - AEM
89%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
KGC - AEM
88%
Closely correlated
+5.45%
NEM - AEM
86%
Closely correlated
+3.80%
GOLD - AEM
86%
Closely correlated
+2.75%
More

WRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRLGF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRLGF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRLGF
1D Price
Change %
WRLGF100%
+3.28%
AEM - WRLGF
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
GOLD - WRLGF
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.75%
AGI - WRLGF
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.96%
KGC - WRLGF
40%
Loosely correlated
+5.45%
SAND - WRLGF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More