AEM
Price
$182.65
Change
+$1.31 (+0.72%)
Updated
Dec 26, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
90.85B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NEM
Price
$104.73
Change
-$0.52 (-0.49%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
114.29B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs NEM

Header iconAEM vs NEM Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs NEMBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$182.65
Change+$1.31 (+0.72%)
Volume$830
Capitalization90.85B
Newmont
Price$104.73
Change-$0.52 (-0.49%)
Volume$2.09M
Capitalization114.29B
AEM vs NEM Comparison Chart in %
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. NEM commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and NEM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $181.34 vs. NEM: $104.73)
Brand notoriety: AEM: Not notable vs. NEM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 45% vs. NEM: 20%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $90.85B vs. NEM: $114.29B
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $90.85B. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $114.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $121.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than AEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AEM and NEM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +8.26% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +10.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +85.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

NEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+10.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($114B) has a higher market cap than AEM($90.9B). AEM has higher P/E ratio than NEM: AEM (26.51) vs NEM (16.29). NEM YTD gains are higher at: 185.323 vs. AEM (134.283). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13B vs. AEM (6.84B). NEM has more cash in the bank: 5.97B vs. AEM (2.36B). AEM has less debt than NEM: AEM (336M) vs NEM (5.65B). NEM has higher revenues than AEM: NEM (21.5B) vs AEM (10.6B).
AEMNEMAEM / NEM
Capitalization90.9B114B80%
EBITDA6.84B13B53%
Gain YTD134.283185.32372%
P/E Ratio26.5116.29163%
Revenue10.6B21.5B49%
Total Cash2.36B5.97B39%
Total Debt336M5.65B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs NEM: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
NEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3041
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
641
SMR RATING
1..100
5341
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
382
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8753
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEM's Valuation (21) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (96) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEM (41) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's SMR Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (53) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (38) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (87) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMNEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLP78.120.61
+0.79%
State Street®CnsmrStpSelSectSPDR®ETF
PFN7.450.02
+0.27%
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II
DIM81.590.11
+0.14%
WisdomTree International MidCap Div ETF
PEZ106.51-0.24
-0.22%
Invesco DW Consumer Cyclicals Momt ETF
SLVR57.32-0.14
-0.24%
Sprott Silver Mnrs & Physical Silver ETF

AEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEM
1D Price
Change %
AEM100%
+0.04%
WPM - AEM
91%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
FNV - AEM
87%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
KGC - AEM
87%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
AGI - AEM
86%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
NEM - AEM
84%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
More

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEM
1D Price
Change %
NEM100%
-0.49%
WPM - NEM
82%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
FNV - NEM
77%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
AGI - NEM
77%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
RGLD - NEM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
CGAU - NEM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
More