AEM
Price
$168.78
Change
-$4.32 (-2.50%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
84.8B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSM
Price
$8.40
Change
-$0.23 (-2.67%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.58B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs FSM

Header iconAEM vs FSM Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs FSMBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$168.78
Change-$4.32 (-2.50%)
Volume$20.06K
Capitalization84.8B
Fortuna Mining
Price$8.40
Change-$0.23 (-2.67%)
Volume$7.45M
Capitalization2.58B
AEM vs FSM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. FSM commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and FSM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $173.10 vs. FSM: $8.63)
Brand notoriety: AEM and FSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 80% vs. FSM: 53%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $84.8B vs. FSM: $2.58B
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $84.8B. FSM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $115.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the short-term than FSM.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +8.40% price change this week, while FSM (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6505.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($84.8B) has a higher market cap than FSM($2.58B). AEM has higher P/E ratio than FSM: AEM (24.69) vs FSM (10.00). AEM YTD gains are higher at: 123.638 vs. FSM (101.166). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.07B vs. FSM (564M). AEM has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. FSM (394M). FSM has less debt than AEM: FSM (216M) vs AEM (734M). AEM has higher revenues than FSM: AEM (9.66B) vs FSM (1.19B).
AEMFSMAEM / FSM
Capitalization84.8B2.58B3,283%
EBITDA6.07B564M1,076%
Gain YTD123.638101.166122%
P/E Ratio24.6910.00247%
Revenue9.66B1.19B814%
Total Cash1.57B394M398%
Total Debt734M216M340%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs FSM: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
FSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1481
SMR RATING
1..100
5767
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSM's Valuation (64) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (96) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSM (81) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew significantly faster than FSM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (67) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (41) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMFSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PJDQX19.510.11
+0.57%
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend R6
CGVFX28.600.14
+0.49%
American Funds Global Insight 529-F-1
TIOHX17.830.04
+0.22%
Nuveen International Opps I
IAXIX11.27-0.03
-0.27%
VY® T. Rowe Price Divers Mid Cap Gr I
IRCIX13.05-0.04
-0.31%
Voya Russell Small Cap Index Port S2

AEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEM
1D Price
Change %
AEM100%
+3.13%
WPM - AEM
93%
Closely correlated
+3.54%
KGC - AEM
87%
Closely correlated
+2.68%
AGI - AEM
87%
Closely correlated
+3.03%
FNV - AEM
86%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
OR - AEM
84%
Closely correlated
+2.96%
More

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
+2.74%
KGC - FSM
70%
Closely correlated
+2.68%
IAG - FSM
70%
Closely correlated
+5.49%
WPM - FSM
69%
Closely correlated
+3.54%
NGD - FSM
69%
Closely correlated
+3.84%
AEM - FSM
68%
Closely correlated
+3.13%
More