AEM
Price
$168.87
Change
-$4.23 (-2.44%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
84.8B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DGDCF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
8.78M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs DGDCF

Header iconAEM vs DGDCF Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs DGDCFBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$168.87
Change-$4.23 (-2.44%)
Volume$2.55M
Capitalization84.8B
Dynasty Gold
Price$0.12
Change-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Volume$190.33K
Capitalization8.78M
AEM vs DGDCF Comparison Chart in %
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DGDCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. DGDCF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and DGDCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $168.87 vs. DGDCF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: AEM and DGDCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 84% vs. DGDCF: 491%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $84.8B vs. DGDCF: $8.78M
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $84.8B. DGDCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $115.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDGDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DGDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the long-term than DGDCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DGDCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DGDCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the short-term than DGDCF.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.01% price change this week, while DGDCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8543.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.93% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($84.8B) has a higher market cap than DGDCF($8.78M). AEM YTD gains are higher at: 118.173 vs. DGDCF (32.009). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.07B vs. DGDCF (-638.08K). AEM has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. DGDCF (2.23M). AEM has higher revenues than DGDCF: AEM (9.66B) vs DGDCF (0).
AEMDGDCFAEM / DGDCF
Capitalization84.8B8.78M966,051%
EBITDA6.07B-638.08K-951,445%
Gain YTD118.17332.009369%
P/E Ratio24.69N/A-
Revenue9.66B0-
Total Cash1.57B2.23M70,327%
Total Debt734MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs DGDCF: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
DGDCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7662
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1587
SMR RATING
1..100
5793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DGDCF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (96). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DGDCF (87). This means that AEM’s stock grew significantly faster than DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DGDCF (93). This means that AEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (43). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (100). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMDGDCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DGDCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBSI35.170.32
+0.92%
Barrett Business Services Inc.
SYBX1.67-0.01
-0.60%
Synlogic
ASB25.38-0.16
-0.63%
Associated Banc-Corp
AME194.15-2.64
-1.34%
Ametek
LTRX4.90-0.29
-5.59%
Lantronix

AEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEM
1D Price
Change %
AEM100%
-2.44%
WPM - AEM
93%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
KGC - AEM
87%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
AGI - AEM
87%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
FNV - AEM
86%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
OR - AEM
84%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
More

DGDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DGDCF and GSHRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DGDCF and GSHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGDCF
1D Price
Change %
DGDCF100%
-11.20%
GSHRF - DGDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
AEM - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
AGI - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
ABNAF - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.80%
IAG - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.44%
More