AEM
Price
$133.35
Change
+$0.62 (+0.47%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
67.33B
72 days until earnings call
CGAU
Price
$7.27
Change
+$0.26 (+3.71%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs CGAU

Header iconAEM vs CGAU Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs CGAUBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$133.35
Change+$0.62 (+0.47%)
Volume$2.17M
Capitalization67.33B
Centerra Gold
Price$7.27
Change+$0.26 (+3.71%)
Volume$2.17M
Capitalization1.48B
AEM vs CGAU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. CGAU commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and CGAU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $133.35 vs. CGAU: $7.27)
Brand notoriety: AEM and CGAU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 85% vs. CGAU: 201%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $67.33B vs. CGAU: $1.48B
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $67.33B. CGAU’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $79.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCGAU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CGAU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGAU is a better buy in the long-term than AEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGAU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CGAU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the short-term than CGAU.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.67% price change this week, while CGAU (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4693.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

CGAU is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.09% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($67.3B) has a higher market cap than CGAU($1.48B). AEM has higher P/E ratio than CGAU: AEM (22.68) vs CGAU (21.38). AEM YTD gains are higher at: 71.804 vs. CGAU (27.768). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.07B vs. CGAU (255M). AEM has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. CGAU (612M). CGAU has less debt than AEM: CGAU (19.5M) vs AEM (734M). AEM has higher revenues than CGAU: AEM (9.66B) vs CGAU (1.21B).
AEMCGAUAEM / CGAU
Capitalization67.3B1.48B4,544%
EBITDA6.07B255M2,381%
Gain YTD71.80427.768259%
P/E Ratio22.6821.38106%
Revenue9.66B1.21B800%
Total Cash1.57B612M256%
Total Debt734M19.5M3,764%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs CGAU: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
CGAU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25100
SMR RATING
1..100
5888
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9810
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGAU's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (96). This means that CGAU’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGAU (100). This means that AEM’s stock grew significantly faster than CGAU’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CGAU (88). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to CGAU’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CGAU (50). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to CGAU’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (98). This means that CGAU’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMCGAU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OMCIX49.880.03
+0.06%
Oberweis Micro Cap Institutional
MIRGX42.59-0.14
-0.33%
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk R2
CYPIX74.06-0.30
-0.40%
ProFunds Consumer Disctnry Ultra Sec Inv
POPFX28.97-0.17
-0.58%
Prospector Opportunity
GTSGX16.49-0.15
-0.90%
Madison Mid Cap Y

AEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEM
1D Price
Change %
AEM100%
+0.47%
WPM - AEM
91%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
AGI - AEM
87%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
KGC - AEM
85%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
OR - AEM
83%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
FNV - AEM
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

CGAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGAU has been closely correlated with EGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGAU jumps, then EGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGAU
1D Price
Change %
CGAU100%
+3.71%
EGO - CGAU
77%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
AEM - CGAU
76%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
AGI - CGAU
76%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
PAAS - CGAU
75%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
WPM - CGAU
74%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
More