AEHL
Price
$2.62
Change
+$0.01 (+0.38%)
Updated
May 14, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.15M
FBIN
Price
$54.70
Change
-$1.74 (-3.08%)
Updated
May 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.44B
70 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AEHL vs FBIN

Header iconAEHL vs FBIN Comparison
Open Charts AEHL vs FBINBanner chart's image
Antelope Enterprise Holdings
Price$2.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.38%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.15M
Fortune Brands Innovations
Price$54.70
Change-$1.74 (-3.08%)
Volume$31.54K
Capitalization10.44B
AEHL vs FBIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
AEHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEHL vs. FBIN commentary
May 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEHL is a Hold and FBIN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 15, 2025
Stock price -- (AEHL: $2.61 vs. FBIN: $56.44)
Brand notoriety: AEHL and FBIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEHL: 23% vs. FBIN: 108%
Market capitalization -- AEHL: $10.15M vs. FBIN: $10.44B
AEHL [@Building Products] is valued at $10.15M. FBIN’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $10.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $67.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFBIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AEHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FBIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBIN is a better buy in the long-term than AEHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEHL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEHL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FBIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEHL is a better buy in the short-term than FBIN.

Price Growth

AEHL (@Building Products) experienced а +1.56% price change this week, while FBIN (@Building Products) price change was +6.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+4.33% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBIN($10.4B) has a higher market cap than AEHL($10.1M). FBIN has higher P/E ratio than AEHL: FBIN (26.20) vs AEHL (0.62). FBIN YTD gains are higher at: -17.090 vs. AEHL (-71.394). FBIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 803M vs. AEHL (-5.16M). FBIN has higher revenues than AEHL: FBIN (4.63B) vs AEHL (286M).
AEHLFBINAEHL / FBIN
Capitalization10.1M10.4B0%
EBITDA-5.16M803M-1%
Gain YTD-71.394-17.090418%
P/E Ratio0.6226.202%
Revenue286M4.63B6%
Total CashN/A366M-
Total DebtN/A2.81B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEHL vs FBIN: Fundamental Ratings
AEHL
FBIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
10046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10082
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
39n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AEHL's Valuation (44) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as FBIN (61). This means that AEHL’s stock grew similarly to FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

FBIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEHL (100). This means that FBIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEHL’s over the last 12 months.

FBIN's SMR Rating (46) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEHL (100). This means that FBIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEHL’s over the last 12 months.

FBIN's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEHL (94). This means that FBIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEHL’s over the last 12 months.

FBIN's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as AEHL (100). This means that FBIN’s stock grew similarly to AEHL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEHLFBIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AEHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA334.0715.69
+4.93%
Tesla
BTC.X104169.8100001356.851600
+1.32%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME28.390.34
+1.21%
GameStop Corp
AAPL212.932.14
+1.02%
Apple
SPY586.843.85
+0.66%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF

AEHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AEHL and TREX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEHL and TREX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEHL
1D Price
Change %
AEHL100%
-5.09%
TREX - AEHL
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
MAS - AEHL
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
GMS - AEHL
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
OC - AEHL
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
FBIN - AEHL
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
More

FBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBIN has been closely correlated with MAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBIN jumps, then MAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBIN
1D Price
Change %
FBIN100%
-1.66%
MAS - FBIN
85%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
OC - FBIN
74%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
AWI - FBIN
69%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
WMS - FBIN
68%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
TREX - FBIN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
More