Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGSX vs BAFHX
AEGSX vs BAFHX Comparison
Open Charts AEGSX vs BAFHX
Invesco International Value R6
Price$35.55
Change-$0.87 (-2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets983.21M
Brown Advisory WMC Strat Eurp Eq Instl
Price$19.08
Change+$0.57 (+3.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets750.87M
AEGSX vs BAFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGSX vs. BAFHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGSX is a Hold and BAFHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGSX has more cash in the bank: 983M vs. BAFHX (751M). AEGSX pays higher dividends than BAFHX: AEGSX (2.35) vs BAFHX (1.33). AEGSX was incepted earlier than BAFHX: AEGSX (9 years) vs BAFHX (12 years). BAFHX (1.05) is less costly to investors than AEGSX (0.95). AEGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. BAFHX (47.00). AEGSX (1000000) and BAFHX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BAFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.96 vs. AEGSX (12.92). BAFHX return over 5 years is better than : 70.58 vs. AEGSX (-0.83).
| AEGSX | BAFHX | AEGSX / BAFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.05 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.05 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.662 | 6.533 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 983M | 751M | 131% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 1.33 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.92 | 41.96 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.57 | 71.88 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.83 | 70.58 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 124.05 | - |