AEGOF
Price
$8.00
Change
+$0.55 (+7.38%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
11.94B
AIVAF
Price
$9.21
Change
+$0.06 (+0.66%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
26.38B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEGOF vs AIVAF

Header iconAEGOF vs AIVAF Comparison
Open Charts AEGOF vs AIVAFBanner chart's image
Aegon
Price$8.00
Change+$0.55 (+7.38%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization11.94B
Aviva
Price$9.21
Change+$0.06 (+0.66%)
Volume$298
Capitalization26.38B
AEGOF vs AIVAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AEGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AIVAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEGOF vs. AIVAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGOF is a StrongBuy and AIVAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AEGOF: $8.00 vs. AIVAF: $9.20)
Brand notoriety: AEGOF and AIVAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEGOF: 140% vs. AIVAF: 14%
Market capitalization -- AEGOF: $11.94B vs. AIVAF: $26.38B
AEGOF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $11.94B. AIVAF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $26.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $31.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEGOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileAIVAF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AEGOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • AIVAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIVAF is a better buy in the long-term than AEGOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEGOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AIVAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEGOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • AIVAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEGOF is a better buy in the short-term than AIVAF.

Price Growth

AEGOF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while AIVAF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-1.17% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIVAF($26.4B) has a higher market cap than AEGOF($11.9B). AIVAF has higher P/E ratio than AEGOF: AIVAF (30.85) vs AEGOF (8.80). AIVAF YTD gains are higher at: 61.775 vs. AEGOF (34.454).
AEGOFAIVAFAEGOF / AIVAF
Capitalization11.9B26.4B45%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.45461.77556%
P/E Ratio8.8030.8529%
RevenueN/A29.9B-
Total CashN/A20B-
Total DebtN/A6.12B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEGOF vs AIVAF: Fundamental Ratings
AEGOF
AIVAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4833
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
178
SMR RATING
1..100
9897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
936
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AEGOF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as AIVAF (20). This means that AEGOF’s stock grew similarly to AIVAF’s over the last 12 months.

AIVAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as AEGOF (17). This means that AIVAF’s stock grew similarly to AEGOF’s over the last 12 months.

AIVAF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as AEGOF (98). This means that AIVAF’s stock grew similarly to AEGOF’s over the last 12 months.

AEGOF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as AIVAF (44). This means that AEGOF’s stock grew similarly to AIVAF’s over the last 12 months.

AIVAF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEGOF (93). This means that AIVAF’s stock grew significantly faster than AEGOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEGOFAIVAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AIVAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCKT20.760.39
+1.91%
Hackett Group
ACM125.941.86
+1.50%
Aecom
IQ2.71N/A
N/A
iQIYI
IFBD0.95-0.02
-2.18%
Infobird Co Ltd
BTMD3.39-0.10
-2.87%
Biote Corp

AEGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AEGOF and AXAHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEGOF and AXAHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEGOF
1D Price
Change %
AEGOF100%
N/A
AXAHF - AEGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.67%
AXAHY - AEGOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
AIVAF - AEGOF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGIC - AEGOF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
ARZGF - AEGOF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

AIVAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIVAF and AEGOF have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIVAF and AEGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIVAF
1D Price
Change %
AIVAF100%
N/A
AEGOF - AIVAF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALIZY - AIVAF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
AGESY - AIVAF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARZGY - AIVAF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
AVVIY - AIVAF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
More