Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs MNOZX
AEGFX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$60.25
Change+$0.15 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$37.17
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets330.29M
AEGFX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. MNOZX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and MNOZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. MNOZX (330M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than AEGFX: MNOZX (1.19) vs AEGFX (0.62). AEGFX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: AEGFX (25 years) vs MNOZX (8 years). AEGFX (0.86) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. AEGFX (35.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: AEGFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). MNOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.37 vs. AEGFX (11.62). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 23.44 vs. AEGFX (-7.38).
| AEGFX | MNOZX | AEGFX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.66 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.71 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.701 | 15.650 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 330M | 40,606% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.19 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.62 | 14.37 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.82 | 43.68 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.38 | 23.44 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement