Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs HNCCX
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$58.70
Change-$0.79 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$17.23
Change-$0.29 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.39M
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and HNCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. HNCCX (323M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEGFX (1.00) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEGFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEGFX (24 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). HNCCX (31.00) and AEGFX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEGFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.54 vs. AEGFX (3.51). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.83 vs. AEGFX (18.85).
| AEGFX | HNCCX | AEGFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.05 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.14 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.802 | 13.729 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 323M | 41,176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.51 | 12.54 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.77 | 47.90 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.85 | 31.83 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.70 | 41.83 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement