Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs HNCCX
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$65.57
Change-$1.12 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$18.93
Change-$0.45 (-2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets383.01M
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and HNCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. HNCCX (383M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEGFX (0.62) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEGFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEGFX (25 years) vs HNCCX (25 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEGFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.67 vs. AEGFX (16.08). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.58 vs. AEGFX (8.54).
| AEGFX | HNCCX | AEGFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.05 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.14 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.652 | 27.921 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 383M | 36,292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.08 | 27.67 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.87 | 55.54 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.54 | 21.58 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.31 | 75.33 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers