Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs HNCCX
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$64.92
Change-$0.27 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$18.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.95M
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and HNCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. HNCCX (367M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEGFX (0.63) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEGFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEGFX (25 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEGFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.26 vs. AEGFX (11.04). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.29 vs. AEGFX (13.82).
| AEGFX | HNCCX | AEGFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.05 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.14 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.437 | 25.083 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 367M | 37,602% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.04 | 22.26 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.71 | 79.62 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | 23.29 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.45 | 68.11 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement