Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs CCWSX
AEGFX vs CCWSX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs CCWSX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$63.56
Change-$1.61 (-2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
Baird Chautauqua International Gr I
Price$21.67
Change-$1.05 (-4.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
AEGFX vs CCWSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. CCWSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and CCWSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. CCWSX (1.57B). AEGFX pays higher dividends than CCWSX: AEGFX (2.59) vs CCWSX (0.33). AEGFX was incepted earlier than CCWSX: AEGFX (25 years) vs CCWSX (10 years). CCWSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CCWSX (18.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWSX: AEGFX (250) vs CCWSX (2500). AEGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.28 vs. CCWSX (10.87). CCWSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.18 vs. AEGFX (-4.23).
| AEGFX | CCWSX | AEGFX / CCWSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.05 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.09 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.652 | -1.634 | -346% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 1.57B | 8,604% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 0.33 | 781% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.28 | 10.87 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.47 | 30.35 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.23 | 18.18 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement