Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs BINIX
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs BINIX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$65.57
Change-$1.12 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$32.68
Change-$0.29 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets355.26M
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. BINIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and BINIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. BINIX (355M). BINIX pays higher dividends than AEGFX: BINIX (0.66) vs AEGFX (0.62). AEGFX was incepted earlier than BINIX: AEGFX (25 years) vs BINIX (16 years). BINIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: AEGFX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. AEGFX (17.19). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.62 vs. AEGFX (10.40).
| AEGFX | BINIX | AEGFX / BINIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.747 | 22.820 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 355M | 39,155% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.66 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.19 | 22.46 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.98 | 38.77 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.40 | 14.62 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.73 | 89.23 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers