Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs BINIX
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs BINIX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$60.25
Change+$0.15 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$32.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.66M
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. BINIX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and BINIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. BINIX (328M). BINIX pays higher dividends than AEGFX: BINIX (0.68) vs AEGFX (0.62). AEGFX was incepted earlier than BINIX: AEGFX (25 years) vs BINIX (17 years). BINIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: AEGFX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.14 vs. AEGFX (11.62). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.27 vs. AEGFX (-7.38).
| AEGFX | BINIX | AEGFX / BINIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.701 | 20.119 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 328M | 40,854% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.68 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.62 | 19.14 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.82 | 35.55 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.38 | 4.27 | -173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.31 | 84.20 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers