Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs BINIX
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs BINIX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$65.41
Change+$0.52 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$32.32
Change+$0.14 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.99M
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. BINIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and BINIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. BINIX (323M). BINIX pays higher dividends than AEGFX: BINIX (0.68) vs AEGFX (0.62). AEGFX was incepted earlier than BINIX: AEGFX (25 years) vs BINIX (17 years). BINIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: AEGFX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.12 vs. AEGFX (12.39). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 6.89 vs. AEGFX (2.42).
| AEGFX | BINIX | AEGFX / BINIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.156 | 19.493 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 323M | 41,486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.68 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.39 | 17.12 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.59 | 30.52 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.42 | 6.89 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.21 | 80.56 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement