Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs BINIX
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs BINIX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$63.56
Change-$1.61 (-2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$33.70
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.48M
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. BINIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and BINIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BINIX (326M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than BINIX: AEGFX (2.59) vs BINIX (1.11). AEGFX was incepted earlier than BINIX: AEGFX (25 years) vs BINIX (17 years). BINIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: AEGFX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.98 vs. AEGFX (18.28). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. AEGFX (-4.23).
| AEGFX | BINIX | AEGFX / BINIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.652 | 4.854 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 326M | 41,411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 1.11 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.28 | 23.98 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.47 | 31.09 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.23 | 3.16 | -134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.54 | 116.03 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers