It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBBSEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BBSEY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AEG (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -10.97% price change this week, while BBSEY (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -4.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.33%.
AEG is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
BBSEY is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.
A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
AEG | BBSEY | AEG / BBSEY | |
Capitalization | 10.8B | 13.1B | 82% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 7.795 | -4.333 | -180% |
P/E Ratio | 13.16 | 9.06 | 145% |
Revenue | 17.8B | 4.89B | 364% |
Total Cash | 57B | 3.51M | 1,625,784% |
Total Debt | 5.4B | N/A | - |
AEG | BBSEY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AEG's Valuation (9) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBSEY (73) in the null industry. This means that AEG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBSEY’s over the last 12 months.
AEG's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBSEY (79) in the null industry. This means that AEG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBSEY’s over the last 12 months.
BBSEY's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEG (98) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that BBSEY’s stock grew significantly faster than AEG’s over the last 12 months.
BBSEY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as AEG (60) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that BBSEY’s stock grew similarly to AEG’s over the last 12 months.
AEG's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBSEY (52) in the null industry. This means that AEG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBSEY’s over the last 12 months.
AEG | BBSEY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago64% | 9 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 4 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago71% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEG has been loosely correlated with NNGRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEG jumps, then NNGRY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AEG | 100% | -2.57% | ||
NNGRY - AEG | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
AVVIY - AEG | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.49% | ||
EQH - AEG | 47% Loosely correlated | -4.75% | ||
AIG - AEG | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
ZURVY - AEG | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.43% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BBSEY and AVVIY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBSEY and AVVIY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBSEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BBSEY | 100% | -2.80% | ||
AVVIY - BBSEY | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.49% | ||
AEG - BBSEY | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.57% | ||
SAXPY - BBSEY | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
SLF - BBSEY | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
ALIZY - BBSEY | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.69% | ||
More |